Skip to main content
Category: Thinking
Type: Predictive Analysis
Origin: Gary Klein (2007)
Also known as: Pre-Mortem Analysis, Prospective Hindsight, Premortem
Quick Answer — Pre-Mortem Thinking is a cognitive technique where you imagine that your plan has already failed, then work backward to determine what could have caused the failure. Developed by psychologist Gary Klein, it leverages prospective hindsight to overcome optimistic bias and identify risks that standard planning misses. The key insight: it’s easier to see what went wrong after the fact than to predict what might go wrong—which is exactly what this technique exploits.

​
What is Pre-Mortem Thinking?

Pre-Mortem Thinking is a structured analytical technique where you project yourself into the future and imagine that a decision, plan, or project has already failed spectacularly. From that vantage point, you then ask: “What could have caused this failure?” This approach inverts normal planning, which typically asks “How can we succeed?” Instead, it asks “How could we fail?”
The power of Pre-Mortem Thinking lies in its ability to bypass our natural optimism. By imagining failure as already happened, we remove the psychological barrier that prevents us from honestly assessing risks.
The technique was popularized by Gary Klein, a cognitive psychologist who studied how experienced firefighters and military commanders make decisions under uncertainty. He found that these experts often used a form of prospective hindsight—imagining a negative outcome and then working backward—to identify potential problems before they occurred. Think of it as a diagnostic tool for your future. Just as a doctor performs an autopsy to understand what went wrong in a deceased patient, a Pre-Mortem helps you understand what could go wrong in a living plan. The difference is that you’re performing the “autopsy” before the patient has died—giving you the chance to prevent the failure.

​
Origin

The concept of Pre-Mortem Thinking was introduced by Gary Klein in his 2007 book Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. Klein, a cognitive psychologist, had spent decades studying decision-making in high-pressure environments, including fireground commanders, military planners, and business leaders. Through his research, Klein discovered that expert decision-makers didn’t always follow the rational, analytical processes that traditional models suggested. Instead, they often used intuitive techniques that he termed the “pre-mortem.” In a famous study, he asked managers to imagine their company had failed and to explain why—90% of them could identify serious threats that had been overlooked in normal planning sessions. The term “pre-mortem” (literally “before death”) was chosen deliberately to evoke the medical autopsy, but applied prospectively. Where an autopsy examines a dead patient to understand causes of death, a pre-mortem examines a hypothetical failure to prevent it.

​
Key Points

1

Project Forward and Imagine Failure

Set a specific point in the future—end of project, launch date, or decision deadline. Imagine arriving at that point to discover your plan has failed completely. What does the disaster look like?
2

Work Backward to Find Causes

Don’t guess at risks—derive them from the imagined failure. If the project “already failed,” what specific events or decisions led to that failure? List as many causes as possible without judgment.
3

Convert Hypotheses to Preventions

Each identified cause becomes a potential risk to address. Ask: “What could we do now to prevent this failure path?” Prioritize based on likelihood and impact.
4

Share and Validate

Pre-Mortem works best in groups. Share your failure imagination with team members. Different perspectives will reveal different potential failure modes that you wouldn’t see alone.

​
Applications

Project Management

Before launching a new project, run a Pre-Mortem to identify risks that traditional risk assessments might miss. This is especially valuable for ambitious projects where overconfidence is common.

Strategic Planning

When developing long-term strategy, imagine your strategy has failed in three years. This helps identify market shifts, competitive responses, or internal challenges you’d otherwise overlook.

Investment Decisions

Before making significant financial commitments, use Pre-Mortem Thinking to stress-test your investment thesis against potential failure scenarios.

Personal Goals

When setting ambitious personal goals, imagine you’ve failed to achieve them. This exposes the real obstacles—not the ones you tell yourself, but the ones that actually derail progress.

​
Case Study

​
Pharmaceutical Company’s Clinical Trial Planning (2000s)

A major pharmaceutical company adopted Pre-Mortem Thinking to improve their clinical trial planning for a promising new drug. Rather than the traditional approach of asking “How do we ensure success?”, they asked their team to imagine the trial had failed and explain why. The Pre-Mortem session revealed concerns that had been unspoken in normal planning meetings. Team members worried that the selected patient population was too narrow, that competing drugs might receive approval first, and that manufacturing scale-up would face regulatory delays. Most critically, one scientist raised a previously unmentioned concern about potential side effects in a specific demographic. Armed with this information, the company redesigned the trial protocol to address these risks. They expanded the patient population, accelerated manufacturing preparation, and added additional safety monitoring. When the trial eventually succeeded—partly because these risks had been proactively managed—the team credited the Pre-Mortem exercise with saving months of potential delays. The estimated value of the prevented delays exceeded $50 million.

​
Common Misconceptions

Not at all. Pre-Mortem Thinking is actually more optimistic than standard planning—it assumes you can learn from imagined failures and prevent them. It’s about proactive protection, not passive pessimism. The technique builds confidence by making plans more robust.
Traditional risk assessments ask “what could go wrong?” which triggers defensive thinking. Pre-Mortem asks “what did go wrong?” (in the hypothetical past), which triggers diagnostic thinking. This subtle shift in perspective makes people more honest about risks because they’re not directly admitting vulnerability.
Actually, research shows the opposite. Teams that use Pre-Mortem report feeling more confident, not less. The exercise surfaces hidden concerns and transforms anxiety into actionable plans. When risks are out in the open and addressed, people feel more in control.

Red Team Thinking

Adopt an adversary’s perspective to stress-test plans and identify blind spots.

Inversion Thinking

Solve problems by thinking backward—what could cause failure, then avoid those outcomes.

Second-Order Thinking

Consider the consequences of your consequences to anticipate longer-term impacts.

​
One-Line Takeaway

Pre-Mortem Thinking works because the human mind is better at diagnosing what went wrong than predicting what might go wrong—use that natural ability to prevent failure before it happens.