Skip to main content
Category: Methods
Type: Strategic Analysis Method
Origin: Kurt Lewin, psychologist, 1940s
Also known as: Force Field Analysis Diagram, Driving and Restraining Forces Analysis
Quick Answer — Force Field Analysis is a strategic planning tool developed by psychologist Kurt Lewin in the 1940s. It visualizes all forces supporting or opposing a desired change, helping decision-makers understand the balance of power before taking action. The core insight is that organizational change happens when driving forces outweigh restraining forces—and that sometimes weakening resistance is more effective than strengthening driving forces.

​
What is Force Field Analysis?

Force Field Analysis is a diagnostic tool that provides a comprehensive view of the factors affecting any decision or planned change. Developed by Kurt Lewin, one of the founding figures of social psychology, the method rests on the principle that any situation or change exists in an equilibrium between driving forces that push for change and restraining forces that resist it. By systematically mapping both sets of forces, leaders can develop strategies that either strengthen the driving forces or weaken the resisting ones. The power of Force Field Analysis lies in its ability to make invisible dynamics visible. In organizations, resistance to change often appears as vague opposition or “politics,” but Force Field Analysis breaks this down into identifiable forces: resources, attitudes, policies, stakeholder interests, and external pressures. This clarity transforms abstract resistance into concrete factors that can be addressed strategically. The method also introduces a counterintuitive insight: sometimes the most effective path forward is not to push harder in your desired direction, but to reduce the strength of opposing forces. Just as a balloon becomes easier to push when you release pressure on one side, organizational change often becomes achievable by addressing resistance rather than adding more pressure for change.

​
Force Field Analysis in 3 Depths

  • Beginner: When considering a change (new system, policy, or initiative), list all factors that would help it succeed (driving forces) and all factors that would work against it (restraining forces). Rate each on a scale of 1-5 by strength. If driving forces dominate, proceed; if restraining forces are strong, address them first.
  • Practitioner: Use structured stakeholder interviews to identify forces, then create a visual diagram with driving forces on the left and restraining forces on the right, sized by relative strength. Develop specific strategies for each major force: strengthen top driving forces, weaken top restraining forces, and identify any “sleeping” forces that could be activated.
  • Advanced: Model the equilibrium as a dynamic system. Understand that reducing restraining forces can have multiplicative effects (as resistance decreases, driving forces become more effective). Use Force Field Analysis in combination with change management frameworks like ADKAR or Kotter’s 8-Step Model to sequence interventions strategically.

​
Origin

Kurt Lewin (1890-1947) developed Force Field Analysis as part of his broader work on organizational change and group dynamics. Often called the “father of social psychology,” Lewin conducted pioneering research on group behavior, leadership, and the dynamics of change. His work at MIT’s Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, and later at the University of Michigan, established many foundational concepts in change management. Lewin’s insight was revolutionary for its time: he recognized that organizational behavior was not simply the result of individual actions but emerged from the interaction of forces within a “field” or system. Force Field Analysis was his practical tool for making these abstract field dynamics tangible and actionable for leaders. His famous quote—“There is nothing so practical as a good theory”—captures his commitment to developing tools that bridge academic understanding and real-world application. The method gained widespread adoption in the latter half of the twentieth century, particularly in healthcare, education, and organizational development. Today, it remains a foundational tool in strategic planning, change management, and quality improvement initiatives worldwide.

​
Key Points

1

Define the Desired State

Clearly articulate the change or goal you want to achieve. This is your “future state” or target condition. Be specific—what exactly will be different when the change is successful? Vague goals produce vague analysis.
2

Identify Driving Forces

Brainstorm all factors that would help push toward your desired state. These include: supportive leadership, available resources, clear benefits, market pressures, technological opportunities, and willing champions. List everything, even if it seems small.
3

Identify Restraining Forces

List all factors that would push back against your desired state. These include: limited resources, resistant stakeholders, competing priorities, organizational culture, fear of the unknown, and bureaucratic obstacles. Be honest—even powerful stakeholders who might oppose the change.
4

Rate and Prioritize Forces

Assign a strength rating (typically 1-5) to each force based on its current intensity. Then prioritize: focus on the top 3-5 driving forces you can strengthen and the top 3-5 restraining forces you can weaken.
5

Develop Action Strategies

For each priority force, create specific actions. For driving forces: how can you amplify them? For restraining forces: how can you reduce or remove them? Often, weakening resistance yields faster results than strengthening drive.

​
Applications

Organizational Change Management

Use Force Field Analysis before launching major change initiatives—restructuring, new systems, or process improvements. Understanding the full landscape of forces helps you anticipate resistance and design more effective change strategies.

Strategic Planning

When evaluating strategic options (entering new markets, launching products, or making major investments), assess the forces supporting and opposing each option. This reveals which strategies face less resistance and are more likely to succeed.

Problem Diagnosis

When facing persistent problems that won’t resolve, use Force Field Analysis to understand why the problem persists. Often, the solution isn’t adding more effort but removing the forces keeping the problem in place.

Conflict Resolution

In disputes between stakeholders with competing interests, mapping each side’s driving and restraining forces reveals leverage points. Understanding what drives the other party’s position helps identify mutually beneficial solutions.

​
Case Study

A compelling application of Force Field Analysis occurred in healthcare quality improvement. In the early 2000s, a major hospital system wanted to reduce central line infections—a life-threatening but preventable complication. Initial efforts focused on adding safety protocols and training (strengthening driving forces), but progress stalled due to physician resistance and workflow disruptions. A Force Field Analysis revealed that the restraining forces were more powerful than anticipated: physicians viewed the new protocols as threatening their clinical autonomy, nurses felt caught between physician resistance and administrative pressure, and the existing culture valued individual judgment over standardization. Rather than adding more driving force, the team weakened restraining forces by involving physicians in protocol design, creating nurse champions who physician leaders respected, and celebrating early adopters publicly. Within 18 months, central line infections dropped by over 80%—not through more pressure but through smarter resistance management. This case demonstrates Lewin’s core insight: change happens when driving forces exceed restraining forces, and often the most efficient path is to reduce resistance rather than increase push.

​
Boundaries and Failure Modes

Force Field Analysis can reduce complex organizational dynamics to a simple list, missing nonlinear interactions and feedback loops. A force that appears weak might actually be a gateway that controls many other factors. Mitigation: Use the analysis as a starting point, not a complete picture, and validate findings with stakeholder input.
Participants often identify obvious, surface-level forces while missing deeper structural forces like organizational culture, historical relationships, or power dynamics. Mitigation: Include diverse stakeholders and specifically probe for “invisible” forces during analysis.
Forces change over time—today’s driving force might become tomorrow’s restraining force as context shifts. The analysis can create false confidence in a fixed picture. Mitigation: Regularly update the analysis, especially before major decisions or after significant events.

​
Common Misconceptions

A common mistake is treating Force Field Analysis as a one-time exercise rather than an ongoing diagnostic tool. The best practitioners revisit and update their force maps as situations evolve. Another error is treating all forces as equally mutable—some forces are deeply embedded in organizational culture or stakeholder interests and cannot be easily changed. The analysis should help you focus energy where it will have the most impact. Some practitioners also over-emphasize strengthening driving forces when weakening restraining forces is often more effective. Consider the balloon analogy: it’s often easier to release pressure (reduce resistance) than to push harder (increase drive). Finally, Force Field Analysis is sometimes confused with simple pros/cons lists—it is fundamentally different because it analyzes forces specifically in relation to a desired change and considers their relative strength, not just their existence. Force Field Analysis connects deeply to several foundational management frameworks. Kotter’s 8-Step Model (from /models/kotters-8-step-model) provides a sequence for implementing change that addresses both driving and restraining forces over time. Lewin’s Change Model (from /models/lewin-change-model) —unfreeze, change, refreeze—directly relates to weakening resistance and strengthening drive. SWOT Analysis (from /models/swot-analysis) provides a complementary framework for assessing strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Stakeholder Analysis (from /models/stakeholder-analysis) helps identify the specific individuals and groups whose forces matter most.

​
One-Line Takeaway

Force Field Analysis reveals that change isn’t just about pushing harder toward your goal—it’s about understanding the full ecosystem of forces and strategically either amplifying what drives success or reducing what sustains the status quo.